Oxley Woods Living

Life in an Oxley Woods eco house

 
 

Posts Tagged ‘RSHP’

 

Taylor Wimpey “unwilling to complete the build of the RSH&P homes”

April 1, 2011

We all knew it, despite claiming to appreciate and understand the residents of their very special development, Taylor Wimpey have confirmed in writing to residents that they are “unwilling to complete the build of the RSH&P homes”.

So then residents, English Partnerships (Homes and Communities Agency), ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister), RSH+P (Rogers, Stirk, Harbour + Partners) RIBA, Manser Medal awards panel, Milton Keynes Partnerships, Milton Keynes Council, Innovative Housebuilder of the Year awards panel and everyone else who’s put their faith, their time, their money, their awards into Taylor Wimpey, the Oxley Woods development, the 60k homes (design for manufacture) competition, our community, all that this site apparently stood for. “Screw you”. That certainly appears to be the message from Wimpey. They’re not budging, and they are not willing to carry out the plans we all bought in to.

Dear Mr **********

Thank you for your email and attached letter. I appreciate you taking the time to write on behalf of your neighbours, and for responding within the timescales in my letter.

It was not our intention that only the two representatives would see the three options, I was planning to give the three options to the two representatives to distribute to and discuss with their community and then those two representatives would feed back the views of everyone to enable us to chose together which of the three option, or a combination of the three, would be progressed through planning. It is very difficult to design a site with a large number of people which is why I suggested two representatives.

Taylor Wimpey is unwilling to complete the build of the RSH&P homes for the reasons in my previous letter. We did want input from the existing residents before submitting a planning application. However it is now likely that Taylor Wimpey will choose which of the three designs to proceed with, and you will be able to make representation during the planning application in the usual way.

Regards

Stephanie

By the way, the “reasons stated” I’ll try to dissect at a later date. I believe there are more holes in their arguments than an old pair of fishnet stockings. They just want to maximise profits, and be damned anyone who doesn’t agree.

Wimpey rule out RSH+P, want “committee of two” to negotiate plans

March 24, 2011

Residents of RSH+P designed multi-award winning development Oxley Woods have today received a staggering letter from house builders Taylor Wimpey, outlining their plan to placate residents and steam-roller through their plans to ditch the much fought for, and highly acclaimed RSH+P eco-homes in favour of CMYK penned alternatives.

The letter, attached below, suggests interested residents elect a committee of two. Those two individuals, sorry, that “committee” will then be privy to three alternative designs by CMYK. Then, they will state a preference, after discussion with residents, to allow Wimpey to put in planning for their choice of homes, and being in a position to claim some sort of “proper consultation” those plans will be viewed favourably by the authorities.

Once again, Wimpey are trying to play the system, and attempting to make it seem that they WILL build what they want, and the only way residents get a say is on Wimpey’s terms.

This isn’t the case. If residents wish to object and reject completely Wimpey’s plans we have every right to so.

Apparently, they’re telling those of us who’ve already bought these homes, people just don’t want to buy them.

Perhaps they should be offering full refunds instead, as we were told they were desirable and special. Or, it would appear, continue to treat their customers like naive fools.

Click here to view the letter sent to Oxley Woods residents.

Ivan Harbour of RSH+P has his say

March 13, 2011

Ivan Harbour from architects RSH+P, designers of the Oxley Woods housing we all know and love, has written an in depth, interesting, and somewhat encouraging letter to all concerned with the future of Oxley Woods. The letter is addressed to residents, but contains information and points of view I am sure will be of interest to many.

The letter, in its original PDF format is attached to this post. Ivan Harbour Letter to Oxley Woods Residents

It’s more than just colour, Taylor Wimpey and CMYK

January 21, 2011

In the letter from CMYK (Planning and Design) Limited, which prompted the recent sequence of events, and confirmed Taylor Wimpey’s plans to drop the award winning Oxley Woods housing scheme, there were several points which have raised concern among residents. I just want to focus on a few of those in this post.

One point in the letter that has caused raised eyebrows is this line:

As Outline consent already exists on this land, we are not seeking comments on the principles of development

Surely the principles of this development are fundamental to any changes Taylor Wimpey wish to make? Surely you cannot simply switch from award winning, Government backed, sustainable house construction, to higher density, brick built houses without re-apply for planning?

What they do want is “feedback on the appearance of the dwellings”. I’ve given mine using the loaded questionnaire I received. But the final question feels almost like a trap, to offer “positive feedback” which would be used in the planning process. I could be wrong, but for several reasons I don’t really trust these people. You can see the full questionnaire here (PDF Link) to make your own mind up.

Now, CMYK (Planning and Design) Limited. It is my view there is a LOT more to these properties than “colour” and there’s a lot to dislike about your plans beside a lack thereof.

Rumours began that this was coming in August 2010, thanks to a conversation between a fellow resident and builders on site. It’s taken until January 2011 for anything to be seen. So, lets assume that it hasn’t all been behind the scenes negotiation up until that point, and it’s all been about planning and making sure the proposed houses “fit” within Oxley Woods.

During this time, it appears that CMYK have simply copy and pasted designs from nearby Oxley Gate (also built by Taylor Wimpey), taken off some of the features (solar roof panels), and crammed 26 of them in the space of a planned 23 further RSH+P designed properties.

On that basis, we thought we’d save CMYK and Wimpey several months of work, by taking literally minutes to add their suggested “use of more colour, for example”, and see how much this would beautify their properties, and help them blend seamlessly with the Oxley Woods street scene.

The results haven’t changed our minds.

What we have:

What Taylor Wimpey suggested building:

New Oxley Woods

An adapted version using “more colour” as intimated at by CMYK:

Beautiful? Fitting? Helping create a compelling and cohesive street scene? I don’t think so.

You see, this is about much more than colour, it goes beyond the face value interpretation of “design”. Taylor Wimpey and CMYK between them failing to see or acknowledge this highlights the threat to the development. I truly hope RSH+P come back on board, and save us from this disaster waiting to happen.

A matter of faith, innovation, principles and community

January 14, 2011

The 145 home Oxley Woods housing development has won plaudits, international recognition, and many prizes. Our homes and community have received the following accolades:

  • The Manser Medal for Houses and Housing Award 2008 – awarded during RIBA Stirling Prize
  • Housebuilding Innovation Awards 2007 – Housebuilding Innovator of the Year (large housebuilder) and
    Best Innovation in the Use of Materials and Products
  • Housing Design Awards 2008 – Large House Builder category
  • RICS South East Regional Award 2008 - Sustainability category
  • RIBA South Regional Award 2008
  • Evening Standard New Homes Award 2008
  • RICS National Awards – Sustainability category 2008
  • Building for Life 2008 – Gold Standard.

For us, the most amazing thing this development has achieved, despite being almost 20% short of completion, is a strong sense of community.

That’s right, the residents of this RSH+P designed residential development actually talk to one-another!

Having lived in a various communities, new and young, in and around Milton Keynes, I can honestly say the people here are the most friendly, talkative, and proud bunch of residents I’ve had the pleasure to interact with.  It’s something that’s hard to measure, something you cant put your finger on. But these houses, even for their pitfalls and problems, are unique. And the wide range of people, from probably as diverse backgrounds and communities as you could imagine, have all been drawn here by the unique proposition of purchasing one of these very special homes, of being part of a very special community.

And it isn’t just us who recognise this.

The Homes and Communities Agency (of whom English Partnerships are now part) in their report “Design for Manufacture, Lessons Learnt 2″ make numerous mentions of how succeful Oxley Woods is proving, not only in terms of the technology and building techniques employed, but in the community which is growing up here.

Customer feedback has been very positive. Most occupants would be very happy to recommend the development to their friends and families, and a community spirit is already thriving. DfM Report available to download from the HCA website

The three main partners involved have been Taylor Wimpey, Wood Newton and RSH+P. Each of these partners have been responsible for helping to promote and establish the ethos and attitude behind Oxley Woods. As have the Homes and Communities Agency (formerly English Partnerships), and more locally Milton Keynes Partnership (who have even arranged school trips to show future generations how important Oxley Woods is). All of these organisations, and several others, have gained a range of publicity, money and respect for the ethos and attitude of the Oxley Woods development.

So why do I bring this up now? Because it highlights all the more why it seems obsurd that Taylor Wimpey are planning on scrapping this development, despite being less than 85% complete, in favour of the following, brick built, anonymous housing. If Taylor Wimpey has their way, these properties (shown below), are going to be built on the Oxley Woods site in place of the planned RSH+P eco-homes, at a higher density.

I believe this shows a complete lack of respect. A lack of respect for the neighbourhood. A lack of respect for the residents. A lack of respect for all those people, from school children to upcoming architects, who have been told that Oxley Woods and the RSH+P designed homes point the way forward. A lack of respect to the designers and their vision. A lack of respect to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and the Design for Manufacture programme. A lack of respect for the efforts of ALL those involved to push through the original, forward thinking, out of the ordinary plans. A lack of respect for themselves, to abondon a flagship development in favour of brick-built mundanety for the sake, it would seem most likely, of higher profit margins.

Yes this project has no doubt been challenging, yes it’s been a steep learning curve. But those awards, and the many residents who will sing to the hills the virtues of our unique, growing community, are testament to the fact that the ideology is right, that those who fought and planned and worked towards achieving this were right, and that to abandon that now, is wrong.

If you are reading this because you care about Oxley Woods, about architecture, about urban design, about the standard of people’s lives, and the values of community, then please, in whatever way you can, support our pleas to the developers to see this thing through, to build the homes they’ve made a commitment to make, that the residents of Oxley Woods have shown faith in. At the very least, try something new, keep moving forward, maybe gain further plaudits, and don’t fragment our community.

Please also see: The Future of Oxley Woods?
And: The Future of Oxley Woods? Part Two.