<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free water saving device for your showers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oxleywoodsliving.co.uk/eco-living/free-water-saving-device-for-your-showers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oxleywoodsliving.co.uk/eco-living/free-water-saving-device-for-your-showers</link>
	<description>Life in an Oxley Woods eco house</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  9 Jun 2010 06:38:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://oxleywoodsliving.co.uk/eco-living/free-water-saving-device-for-your-showers/comment-page-1#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oxleywoodsliving.co.uk/?p=355#comment-488</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m happy with them (we got two, my mum got one but it doesn&#039;t work with her shower!).  They do slow the flow a bit, but I&#039;ve just moved the dial on the main shower around to a slightly more &quot;powerful&quot; jet setting and it works fine for me (quite possibly negating the benefit at the same time?!).

I don&#039;t find myself spending any longer in the shower, and I don&#039;t think my wife COULD spend any longer in the shower (now I&#039;m in trouble).  Perhaps we just got used to the lower power, I did notice it more at first, but not at all now.  Probably would if we took them off again though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy with them (we got two, my mum got one but it doesn&#8217;t work with her shower!).  They do slow the flow a bit, but I&#8217;ve just moved the dial on the main shower around to a slightly more &#8220;powerful&#8221; jet setting and it works fine for me (quite possibly negating the benefit at the same time?!).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t find myself spending any longer in the shower, and I don&#8217;t think my wife COULD spend any longer in the shower (now I&#8217;m in trouble).  Perhaps we just got used to the lower power, I did notice it more at first, but not at all now.  Probably would if we took them off again though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://oxleywoodsliving.co.uk/eco-living/free-water-saving-device-for-your-showers/comment-page-1#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oxleywoodsliving.co.uk/?p=355#comment-487</guid>
		<description>So after you&#039;ve been using the little piece of metal for a while what do you really think about it? 

I received one yesterday, ordering it after reading this, and I&#039;m a bit disappointed, I&#039;m sure my morning shower took longer due to the water flow been lower so not having as much rinse power. So I think the water savingness is not really going to happen, and it&#039;s also going to use more of my time up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after you&#8217;ve been using the little piece of metal for a while what do you really think about it? </p>
<p>I received one yesterday, ordering it after reading this, and I&#8217;m a bit disappointed, I&#8217;m sure my morning shower took longer due to the water flow been lower so not having as much rinse power. So I think the water savingness is not really going to happen, and it&#8217;s also going to use more of my time up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
